Gmail spam: Difference between revisions

From SWKLS WIKI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


[[File:Message.png|frame|left|message]]
[[File:Message.png|frame|left|message]]


It's pretty obvious that this is spam, but let's dig a little further. We can choose to view the original / header info like this:  
It's pretty obvious that this is spam, but let's dig a little further. We can choose to view the original / header info like this:  


[[File:Message Tools.png|frame|left|Tools]]
[[File:Message Tools.png|frame|left|Tools]]


And then we see the sender and other raw data:  
And then we see the sender and other raw data:  


[[File:Message Original.png|frame|left|Original]]
[[File:Message Original.png|frame|left|Original]]




Nice try, russian hackers. It is possible that messages like this will make it through the spam filter and not be marked as such (no big red warning). If you ever receive a suspicious email from a known source, this is one technique to vet the legitimacy. 
Nice try, russian hackers. It is possible that messages like this will make it through the spam filter and not be marked as such (no big red warning). If you ever receive a suspicious email from a known source, this is one technique to vet the legitimacy. 

Revision as of 15:16, 14 September 2020

I received an email from 'Richard' this morning. It went to my spam folder (as it should have), but I wanted to point out how to check the origin of messages like this to determine if they are legit or spam. There  are three screenshots attached.  First, the message as it appears in GMAIL:

message


It's pretty obvious that this is spam, but let's dig a little further. We can choose to view the original / header info like this:

Tools


And then we see the sender and other raw data:

Original


Nice try, russian hackers. It is possible that messages like this will make it through the spam filter and not be marked as such (no big red warning). If you ever receive a suspicious email from a known source, this is one technique to vet the legitimacy.